Gail moves appellate court to challenge Alok Industries resolution plan
Gail has opposed the resolution plan because it did not consider the government-owned gas and petrochemical company’s claims.
In a petition filed before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Delhi on May 27, Gail has opposed the resolution plan because it did not consider the government-owned gas and petrochemical company’s claims, people familiar with the development said. The appellate tribunal will hear the matter on July 16.
The development is likely to further delay the resolution plan for the Mumbai-based fully integrated textile company that was in the Reserve Bank of India’s first list of 12 large corporate debtors to be referred for insolvency proceedings, released in 2017.
“Gail was not in the picture when the resolution plan was finalised,” a banker involved in the process said. “It came in late and has filed a petition to be considered. It has claimed outstanding dues of Rs 506 crore, but the total amount that operational creditors got was just Rs 4.3 crore in the approved plan so it remains to be seen whether Gail gets anything.”
In March, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Ahmedabad had approved the sole JM-RIL joint bid. The bid amount was Rs 5,000 crore, just above the Rs 4,500 crore liquidation value of Alok. The company owes lenders a total of Rs 30,000 crore, which means they are taking a haircut of a whopping 83%.
State-run GAIL India has argued that while submitting the revival plan the resolution applicant didn’t give equal weightage to the operational creditors. Bankers however said the amount of recovery is too small to consider anything for non-financial creditors.
“The resolution plan submitted by the resolution applicant (JM Financial-RIL) is totally silent towards the operational creditors and that is against the spirit of the law,” said one of the persons privy to the development. “Gail has challenged the resolution plan, approved by the National Company Law Tribunal.”
Gail has made Ajay Joshi, resolution professional (RP) of Alok Industries, as one of the respondents of the case. Joshi did not respond to messages on his mobile phone as of press time Monday.
The banker quoted earlier said, “Operational creditors below Rs 3 lakh were accommodated in the plan. GAIL was a large supplier and so it wasn’t on the list.”
Nishant Awana, partner at law firm NMA Law Chambers, who is advising Gail India in the matter, declined to comment since the matter is sub judice.