9,090.9051.65
Stock Analysis, IPO, Mutual Funds, Bonds & More

View: Budget proposals will have negative impact on insurance sector

The Budget has failed to boost the insurance sector.

ET CONTRIBUTORS|
Last Updated: Feb 05, 2020, 12.40 PM IST
0Comments
Sunil-Badala-BCCl-1200
By Sunil Badala

Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s Budget is woven around three prominent themes (i) Aspirational India (ii) Economic development (iii) A Caring Society. In furtherance of these prominent themes, the government has made several policy and tax announcements.

The government recognises the importance of focussing on the infrastructure sector to achieve its vision of making India a $5 trillion economy by 2024-25. Few months ago, in the monthly economic report of November, the government announced its intention to spend Rs 100 lakh crore on development of modern infrastructure over the next five years. Towards this, Budget rightly announced several measures to boost the infrastructure sector.

It goes without saying that the insurance sector plays a pivotal role in the economic development of the country. Insurance helps in channelising the small savings of the taxpayers into a large pool of funds, which can be invested in capital markets and infrastructure sector, thereby resulting into availability of capital for the growth of the country.

Unfortunately, the Budget has failed to boost the insurance sector. In fact, few Budget proposals have a negative impact on the insurance sector – one such proposal is the introduction of new optional tax regime for individuals and Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) with modified tax slabs and rates. In order to opt for this scheme, the taxpayers will have to forgo a lot of deductions currently available under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (ITA). Once such deduction is under section 80C of the ITA wherein amongst others, taxpayers can claim deduction upto Rs 1,50,000 in respect of premium paid for purchase/renewal of life insurance products.

It is well recognised that insurance is a push product. Many individual taxpayers in India buy life insurance products to claim deduction under the ITA. In view of the new optional tax regime, it is likely that many individual taxpayers in the lower tax bracket may not buy/renew life insurance products going forward. This will have a negative impact on the life insurance sector, thereby impacting the insurance penetration in India, which is already extremely low compared with other countries.

The insurance industry players were hoping that the policy announcement made in previous budget vis-à-vis further liberalisation of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in insurance companies would be announced in Budget 2020. However, no such policy announcement was made. Honestly, such policy announcements need not be part of Budget proposals.

Indian branches of foreign reinsurers were hoping that a special code of taxation, that is fair and unambiguous would be introduced for them and process of obtaining blanket NIL withholding tax certificate would be rationalised on the similar lines as currently applicable to Indian branches of foreign banks. On this matter as well, no announcements were made.

Non-life insurance companies would welcome the proposed amendment regarding allowability of deduction for unpaid statutory liabilities under section 43B of ITA in the year of payment. Another positive announcement for the insurance sector is that the government will divest its holding in Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) through initial public offer and unlock value for investors. However, the negative impact of Budget on the life insurance sector may have an adverse impact on LIC’s valuation.

In the past, there were many instances where few proposals, which were not part of the Budget, were later on considered when Budget was laid down and debated before Parliament. Hence, one hopes that the government would allow the deduction of life insurance premium paid to insurance companies despite opting for a new optional tax regime for individuals and HUF given that it will not only give boost to the sector, but would also lead to more money in taxpayer’s pocket thereby resulting in increased consumption.

Likewise, it is expected that the government would soon enhance the FDI limit in insurance companies up to 74 per cent without insisting on the requirement of ‘Indian controlled’ as this will help the country in bringing better technical know-how, innovation and improving insurance penetration.

(Sunil Badala is Partner and Head of Financial Services Tax at KPMG India. Bharat Jain, Chartered Accountant also contributed to the article)
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com.)

Also Read

Insurance sector has a long runway for growth: Girik Capital

Insurance sector in need of positive enablers, say industry leaders

Jefferies warns of cyclical downturns in life insurance sector; downgrades SBI Life

More women looking for jobs in finance & education; defence, insurance sectors remain less attractive

Comments
Add Your Comments
Commenting feature is disabled in your country/region.

Other useful Links


Copyright © 2020 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service