Never miss a great news story!
Get instant notifications from Economic Times
AllowNot now


You can switch off notifications anytime using browser settings.
11,823.30-90.75
Stock Analysis, IPO, Mutual Funds, Bonds & More

View: Donald Trump should end interventionist foreign policy of US in Afghanistan

Talks between Khalilzad, chief US negotiator, and Talibans are likely to continue to thrash out the issues.

ET CONTRIBUTORS|
Feb 11, 2019, 07.48 AM IST
0Comments
Agencies
donald-trump-agencies1
While addressing the media during his maiden visit to Iraq on December 26, 2018, Trump said “the United States cannot continue to be the policeman of the world."
By: AVINASH MOHANANEY

Credit must be given to President Trump for unmasking the real face of the US interventionist foreign policy, which the previous incumbents used to unsuccessfully camouflage under the garb of protecting American interests, promoting world peace, democracy, human rights, fighting terror etc. While addressing the media during his maiden visit to Iraq on December 26, 2018, Trump said “the United States cannot continue to be the policeman of the world. We are in countries that most people (Americans) have never heard about. And, frankly, it is ridiculous”. The rest of the world can’t agree more.

Credit should also be given to the people of Afghanistan for their remarkable resilience in resisting the foreign intervention despite the US scaring them by using (testing) all kinds of arsenal, including dropping the “mother of all bombs” having yield more than a tactical nuclear weapon on April 13, 2017 in Nangarhar Province. The resistance, unfortunately, is being spearheaded by the Taliban, whom people equally dislike.

Having smelt victory, the Talibans have agreed to provide the much-needed fig leaf to the US promising that they would prevent Afghanistan from ever becoming a platform for international terrorist groups and individuals. The Talibans have, so far, not agreed to the other two conditionalities pressed by the US that they should announce ceasefire and hold talks with the National Unity Government of President Ashraf Ghani. However, they have separately opened channels of communication with other Afghan leaders, including former President Hamid Karzai. The talks between Zalmay Khalilzad, chief US negotiator, and the Talibans are likely to continue to thrash out the above two issues.

What a climb down for the US! A similar result could have been obtained by it with much less death and destruction. At least it would have saved itself the humiliation of pleading before a bunch of obscurantist Mullahs to get this concession.

(The author is former Intelligence Bureau official who served in Jammu & Kashmir and Pakistan)

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com.)
0Comments

Also Read

Islamic State expands reach in Afghanistan, threatening West

Leader of Kerala IS module ‘killed by the US forces in Afghanistan’

US military allegedly promoting ISIS in Afghanistan

India in touch with key stakeholders in Afghanistan

US sees Pakistan-based LeT threat to it in Afghanistan: Pentagon report

Comments
Add Your Comments
Commenting feature is disabled in your country/region.
Download The Economic Times Business News App for Live Elections News & Results, Latest News in Business, Share Market & More.

Other useful Links


Follow us on


Download et app


Copyright © 2019 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service