There are two options under consideration, a government official told ET.
Under one of the plans, the resolution amount would be split into two parts – liquidation amount set by the valuers before the resolution is started, and anything in excess of this amount.
Liquidation amount would be distributed to company’s creditors in accordance with the “waterfall” mechanism set out in Section 53 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as per the plan.
Under this mechanism, all claims of secured financial creditors must be fully paid before payments are made to unsecured financial creditors, who must in turn be fully paid before operational creditors.
Any amount in excess of the liquidation value would be split on a pro-rata basis among all creditors – secured, unsecured and operational.
The government has also proposed this formula for distribution of proceeds from the resolution of debt-ridden Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Group (IL&FS).
“One formula is that everyone has contributed to enterprise value, so up to liquidation value, secured creditors will have the first claim. Till liquidation value, Section 53 (waterfall mechanism) will apply. On the balance, everyone has a claim,” said a government official.
The second formula being considered is to set aside a fixed proportion of 5% or 10% of sale proceeds for operational creditors.
The government is looking at the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which is set to decide on the formula proposed by the government for distribution of proceeds from the sale of IL&FS group entities, before finally taking a call.
IL&FS is not formally under IBC resolution but the process is being overseen by the NCLAT.
“We are awaiting judgement in the IL&FS case,” said the official.
Experts however point out that while the move may help protect the interest of operational creditors, which are often small businesses, it may push financial creditors to opt for other options for recovery.
“It is important to protect the interest of operational creditors because they are very vulnerable, smaller in size and not as capable of protecting their interests but the hurdle is that because the decision making remains with secured lenders, they may try to explore other options for resolution or push the company towards liquidation,” said Major Kumar, partner at law firm Corporate Professionals.
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
6 Comments on this Story
May 361 days ago
Creditors are also business or startup, they too have profit and loss, judiciary should improve delays are major bottleneck in India.
Jayeshkumar Panchal361 days ago
As for Suppliers, the Profit Margins can similarly /thus be excluded in the First Calculation.
Jayeshkumar Panchal361 days ago
A Better way still would be to First Exclude or Discount any and all Interest Amounts from the Secured as well as unsecured Creditors and the Operational Creditors, thus bringing Everybody at par on the Capital invested/imparted or Due. ..and Pay the Interest/Bonus from the additional or above Liquidation amount. (Similar Rules can be formed for the Equity Holders on How much they have benefited vs their Original Investments, as % Return on Investment).