Summary A new report commissioned by the United Nations Environment Programme highlights how humans have massively altered the natural flows of nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients.
NEW DELHI: A new report commissioned by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) highlights how humans have massively altered the natural flows of nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients. While this has had huge benefits for world food and energy production, it has caused a web of water and air pollution that is damaging human health, causing toxic algal blooms, killing fish, threatening sensitive ecosystems and contributing to climate change.
The study "Our Nutrient World" was launched at the UNEP Governing Council/ Global Ministerial Environment Forum in progress in Nairobi, Kenya, from February 18 to 22, 2013. Around 50 experts from 14 countries carried out the study .
According to a press statement by the by the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK, the scientists suggest that a 20% improvement in nutrient use efficiency by 2020 would reduce the annual use of nitrogen fertiliser by 20 million tonnes. They term this global aspirational goal "20:20 for 2020".Their analysis shows how this could provide a net saving worth around 110 (30 to 260) billion pounds Sterling per year. This figure includes implementation costs and financial benefits from reduced nitrogen use and improvements to the environment and human health.
The report stops short of recommending global legislation to control nutrient use, but recognises that this a global problem, especially given the global trade in agricultural products. It calls for an intergovernmental framework to address these issues, and proposes a road map of how such an agreement would look.
Lead author of the report, professor Mark Sutton from the UK's Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, said: "Our analysis shows that by improving the management of the flow of nutrients we can help protect the environment, climate and human health, while addressing food and energy security concerns."
Pollution sources considered in the report include emissions from agriculture and combustion of fossil fuel. Globally around 80% of harvested nitrogen and phosphorus is consumed by livestock rather than directly by people, showing how global nutrient supply and pollution are dominated by humans' choice to consume animal products.
The report proposes a package of ten key actions to reduce these pollution threats, and makes recommendations for shared action by governments, business and citizens.
Key points include:
* Actions that improve the management of nutrients in agriculture, including crops, livestock and manure management. Measures include a range of techniques, which are already available, but typically not yet applied, including precision agricultural methods suitable for both developed, and developing countries. One example already being used in Bangladesh is to 'plant' large fertiliser pellets into the ground, preventing ammonia emission into the air.
* Actions to reduce nutrient losses from industry and wastewater treatment, including the recycling of available resources. A long-term ambition is identified to develop methods to recapture nitrogen oxides from combustion sources, which alone represents a lost resource worth around £25 billion per year.
* Actions to improve local optimisation of nutrient flows, connecting arable and livestock farming to improve nutrient recycling opportunities.
* Lowering personal consumption of animal protein among populations consuming high rates by voluntary reduction and avoiding excess. With rapidly increasing meat and dairy consumption, as Asia and Latin America aspire to European and North American norms, our diet choices have a huge potential to influence future levels of global nutrient pollution.
Co-author Dr Bruna Grizzetti, based atCNRS/ Universite Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) in Paris , France,said: "The option of localising agricultural production is a really important one. Crop and livestock farming are often separated by many 100s of km. Localisation helps improve nutrient recycling, reducing nutrient losses, while bringing the production benefits and pollution responsibilities closer together."
Another co-author professor Oene Oenema based atAlterra and Wageningen University, the Netherlands, said: "Farmers in various countries can greatly decrease nutrient losses and increase nutrient use efficiency through coherent packages of measures. This efficiency gain is the result of research, education, demonstration, novel technologies and improved management techniques."
The report highlights how substantial progress has been made in some countries in reducing emissions from combustion sources and wastewater treatment. By comparison, much less progress has so far been made in reducing emissions from agriculture or regarding citizens' own choices. The relationships highlight the importance of working with key 'cluster points' in nutrient chains where a few key individuals or communities, such as local leaders, supermarkets and governments exercise substantial control.
Sutton said: "One option is to extend and strengthen the mandate of an existing agreement called the 'Global Programme of Action for the protection of the marine environment from land-based activities' (GPA). By clubbing together to meet multiple global challenges for food, energy, water and air pollution, climate and health, a much stronger gravity to motivate action can be expected."