"We call on you to ensure that the ongoing human rights audit of Facebook India reported by Time Magazine is overseen by high level staff in your Menlo Park office, increase engagement with human rights and grassroots organizations in conducting the audit and devising solutions to the continuing problem of dangerous content on your platform, and put head of public policy Ankhi Das on leave pending completion of the audit. The need to act is urgent - lives are at stake," stated the letter.
Following the WSJ report which alleged Ankhi Das, Facebook’s public policy director for India, South and Central Asia opposed applying hate speech rules to posts by BJP leader T Raja Singh and three other BJP leaders and groups flagged internally for promoting violence, the TIME magazine reported that Facebook has commissioned an independent report on its impact on human rights in India in an attempt to evaluate its role in spreading hate speech and incitement to violence.
As per TIME, work on the India audit began before WSJ came out with its report.
TIME stated the audit is being conducted by the US law firm Foley Hoag and will include interviews with senior Facebook staff and members of civil society in India.
In the letter, dated September 9, the NGOs stated the link between content on Facebook and offline violence in India is 'no secret' but articles from WSJ revealed disturbing details about the problem.
The letter stated mass riots in India spurred on by content posted on Facebook have been occurring for at least seven years.
"A mislabeled video on social media was instrumental in stoking the horrific 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots in which 62 people were killed. A BJP politician was even arrested for sharing the video," the NGOs stated in the letter.
"This should have been enough to prompt Mr. Zuckerberg and Facebook to take a step back from operations and conduct a human rights audit to ensure Facebook had the necessary corporate competencies and had taken human rights into account. Despite all this, the company decided to expand in India without hesitation," they added.
The NGOs have stated Facebook must take immediate steps to ensure the independence and thoroughness of the ongoing human rights audit of its India operations, encompassing caste, religious bias, and elections operations. The audit must be removed entirely from the influence of the India office and the company should immediately place Das on a leave of absence, due to the reports of her role in Facebook’s 'continued failure' to enforce its policies in India.
South Asians Building Accountability & Healing (SABAH), Hope not Hate, Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, Muslim Advocates and Free Press are the other NGOs mentioned in the letter.
Read More News on
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
- India very critical market for Instagram: Facebook India MD Ajit Mohan
- We will continue to aggressively invest in India: Facebook India's Head Ajit Mohan
- Facebook India appoints Arun Srinivas as director of global business group
- Facebook India chief Ajit Mohan appears before Parliamentary panel
- Former RSS ideologue Govindacharya seeks Parliamentary probe into workings of Facebook India
- Facebook India appoints Sunil Abraham as Public Policy Director for Data and Emerging Tech
22 Comments on this Story
samynarayana43 days ago
ALmost all NGOs (unless proved beyond doubt) are run by evangelical terrorists with a sole motto of brainwashing gullible, dividing and ruining nation. Now that 40 people are openly identified, they must be encountered. Any one who has not paid tax or produced food / clothing / shelter / some goods/services people need to survive is a TRAITOR of human race. Collecting money from others is not a service. Shoot them down
Dron Khanna44 days ago
This is the voice of dying NGOs. Pay no heed to these. Zickurberg know who they are.
raju mahatre44 days ago
these are NGOs established in older regime, prospered with impunity from all laws of land due to patronage provided by a particular party and set of people with quid pro quo arrangement which has now been dismantled so they are using all possible ways to malign present ruling party but forgetting that this act is damaging country reputation which obviously they don't care for their vested interest,