12,352.35-3.15
Stock Analysis, IPO, Mutual Funds, Bonds & More

Cauvery Water verdict: Applause in Karnataka, disapproval in Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu opposition parties voiced concern over the Supreme Court verdict reducing the amount of water to the state from Cauvery river.

Updated: Feb 16, 2018, 11.15 PM IST
0Comments
PTI
Untitled-9
The Court raised the 270 tmcft share of Cauvery water for Karnataka by 14.75 tmcft and reduced Tamil Nadu's share while compensating it by allowing extraction of 10 tmcft groundwater from the river basin.
BENGALURU/CHENNAI: Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah may be the biggest beneficiary after the Supreme Court verdict on the Cauvery water dispute marginally increased the quantum for the state, even as politicians in Tamil Nadu rued the lack of ‘strong leadership’ like that of J Jayalalithaa.

“This is the first time an upper riparian state has won. We are 70 percent happy,” farmer leader KS Puttanaiah said. With the state set to go for polls in two months, an adverse decision would have been detrimental for the ruling Congress.

For the record, Siddaramaiah said “it is no one’s victory and no one’s loss.” Karnataka’s leader of opposition Jagadish Shettar said all parties had fought together to get the favourable judgement. “Congress will try to claim credit, but it is our lawyers who got us this victory,” he contended.

In Tamil Nadu, government spokesperson D Jayakumar told ET: “While it is a disappointment that the water release has been cut, such blame games are too easy to play.” DMK working president MK Stalin complained the "efforts of the DMK government" in getting final award of the tribunal in 2007 went waste and urged the state government to immediately convene an all-party meeting with farmer associations to discuss methods to mitigate impact.

Former vice-chancellor of Tamil Nadu Agriculture University Chinnachamy Ramaswamy estimated loss at nearly 50% of the current area under cultivation at 2 lakh acres in the Delta region. SKG Giridharan, a cane farmer from Nagapattinam, one of the eight districts of the Cauvery Delta Region said: “In 2016 December, the Supreme Court’s Cauvery supervisory committee surveyed both Tamil Nadu and Karnataka’s delta region. Had the committee known the extent of adversity in Tamil Nadu, it could have changed the course of this judgment,” said.

The reference to groundwater availability — Karnataka has got extra water because of this — has incensed farmers: “It is not feasible to draw groundwater anymore. The water which has been denied to us could have irrigated our crops for 30-40 days,” said KV Ponnaiyan, a farmers’ representative in Erode.

“Though one cannot doubt the erudition of lawyers who represented Tamil Nadu, the fact was that Karnataka was represented by legal giant Fali Nariman. Tamil Nadu too should have engaged a jurist of equal eminence,” former Solicitor General of India Mohan Parasaran told ET.

Also Read

Cauvery Power to face insolvency proceedings

242cr trees to be planted under Cauvery project

India's rivers are severely endangered: Leonardo DiCaprio raises awareness about 'Cauvery Calling'

Centre to soon take up linking of Godavari and Cauvery: Nitin Gadkari

Rajya Sabha adjourned for the day after uproar over Cauvery

Comments
Add Your Comments
Commenting feature is disabled in your country/region.

Other useful Links


Copyright © 2020 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service