The Economic Times
English EditionEnglish Editionहिन्दी
| E-Paper

    PAN becomes mandatory for sending money abroad for kids studies, investing: LRS rules tightened


    RBI has tightened the rules for remitting money abroad under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme and made PAN mandatory for anyone using this scheme.

    ET Online
    Earlier PAN was not insisted upon for putting current account transactions of up to USD 25,000.
    ET Calculator Banner
    You won't be able to send money abroad for your kid's studies, to buy property or shares in foreign countries without PAN now and won't be able to exceed the specified annual limits either. Clearly, this is an attempt by the government to make sure that money being transferred abroad is tax-paid money and also to monitor these remittances closely to ensure that individuals stick to the limits prescribed.

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has tightened the rules for remitting money abroad under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) and has made PAN mandatory for anyone using this scheme. Earlier PAN was not insisted upon for putting current account transactions of up to $25,000.

    The LRS scheme is used by resident Indians to send money abroad for their children's studies and also to invest in foreign stocks and property. LRS was opened up to Indian residents in 2004. Parents who have sent their kids abroad for studies largely use this scheme to send money for payment of fees and meet their living expenses.

    LRS allows a resident Indian to buy stocks of foreign companies such as Google, Apple, etc on foreign stock exchanges or to buy properties abroad. Using LRS scheme, you can invest or send your money anywhere in the world.

    The central bank has made PAN mandatory for every transaction under the scheme after the bank noticed, in January this year, that several Indian businessmen, Bollywood celebrities and diamond merchants rushed to remit funds abroad to bet on stocks and properties and breached the specified limits under the scheme.

    The rules of the scheme allow individuals only to buy stocks and properties abroad and not for pure speculative bets on instruments like derivatives. The annual LRS limit (per individual) was raised in 2015 from $1,25,000 to $2,50,000.

    As per the RBI statement: Pursuant to the announcement made in the first bi-monthly Monetary Policy Statement 2018-19 on April 5, 2018, a system for daily reporting of individual transactions under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) by Authorised Dealer (AD) banks has been put in place. This system enables the AD banks to view the remittances already sent by an individual during the financial year, thus improving monitoring and ensuring compliance with the LRS limits. Since the said reporting system uses the Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the remitter as a Unique Identifier to aggregate the remitter-wise data, it has been decided that furnishing of PAN, which hitherto was not to be insisted upon while putting through permissible current account transactions of upto USD 25,000, shall now be mandatory for making all remittances under LRS. Further, in the context of remittances allowed under LRS for maintenance of close relatives, it has been decided to align the definition of 'relative' with the definition given in Companies Act, 2013 instead of Companies Act, 1956.
    (Click here to know how to save on taxes for the financial year 2020-21.)

    Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.

    6 Comments on this Story

    Vishal Kumar1005 days ago
    Most of illegal transaction doesn''t require PAN or Aadhar. Good. why RBI was doing till now.
    Jai ho.
    Tharayil Venugopalan1006 days ago
    How was RBI monitoring such remittances in the past without PAN? Why it took 14 years for RBI to realize that the scheme is being misused? If this is the way our regulators function only God can save us!
    Of course, havala is the favourite route for such remittances on which RBI has probably very little control. This is an area that needs closer scrutiny and control.
    Rahul Naik1006 days ago
    Suggest take Aadhar id😀
    The Economic Times